SBI -90% Ad-Hoc arrears:

Your attention is drawn to a small writeup on Page in my blog Avenues (Ref:Toplist) the relative link of which being https://uppermost.me/ad-hoc-arrearssbi-retirees/ is given here. More clarificatory a note in this context is since released by KR Saini pointing out and explaining the errors as on the part of the State Bank and the same is reproduced hereunder in this blog Eternity for perusal of the retiree pensioners/ readers. Your feedback in the matter is welcome.


90% AD-HOC ARREARS PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF ANOMALIES OF 5TH,6TH AND 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES—CALCULATION SHEET OF AD-HOC ARREARS–W.P(C)1875/2013 AT DELHI HIGH COURT—ORDER DATED 9.02.2016 AND 26.04.2016–COMMITTEE ON PENSION MATTERS OF STATE BANK OF INDIA


Image result for KR SainiBY THIS TIME I HOPE MOST OF THE RETIREES IN RESPECT OF 5TH,6TH AND PARTICULARY 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES HAVE GOT THE 90% AD-HOC ARREARS ON ACCOUNT OF ANOMALIES IN PENSION PAYMENT TO  5TH,6TH AND 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES.IT HAS BEEN OBSERVED FROM THE CALCULATION SHEET OF AD-HOC ARREARS THAT THERE ARE TYPING MISTAKES OR INTENTIONALLY MENTIONED INCORRECT FIGURES. FOR EXAMPLE IN THE SUMMARY  SHEET  IT HAS BEEN WRITTEN ”PRE REVISED BASIC PENSION” WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN ”PRE REVISED BASIC PAY” THIS PRE REVISED BASIC PAY HAS BEEN ARRIVED AT BY MULTIPLYING THE ACTUAL BASIC PAY DRAWN AT THE TIME OF RETIREMENT MULTIPLY BY 1616 AND DEVIDED BY 1684 WHICH WAS NOT DRAWN BY THE 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES AT THE TIME OF RETIREMENT. THEN PENSION IS CALCULATED AS PER REGULATION 23(1) OF STATE BANK OF INDIA EMPLOYEES’ PENSION FUND REGULATIONS 2014.

   THEN PENSION CALCULATION  W.E.F1.05.2005  UPTO 30.04.2005

   SUBJECT TO MAXIMUM RS7120/                                  RS6883/

IT SHOUD BE ”MINIMUM ” NOT    ” MAXIMUM” FOR 40% SLAB.

                                       W,P(C)1875/2013

IT IS CLEAR ORDERS BY HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT DATED 9.02.2016 AND 26.04.2016 THAT PENSION SHOULD BE CALCULATED AS PER REGULATION 21(1) AND LETTER NO CDO/PM/16/SPL/1187 DATED 30.10.2002 WRITTEN BY THEN CHAIRMAN TO M.O.F CONTAINING ALL THE GRIEVENCES OF THE PENSIONERS OF SB.I SHOULD BE PLACED BEFORE ”COMMITTEE ON PENSION MATTERS OF STATE BANK OF INDIA.

                   NOTE ON THE EXTRACT FROM BANK’S LETTER NO CDO/PM/16/SPL/1187 DATED 30.10.2002.

I RETERATE THAT ABOVE NOTED LETTER CONTAINS 37 PAGES AND DEAL IN PENSION, D.A ON PENSION,FAMILY PENSION AND COMMUTATION FORMULA IN S.B.I AND BANK’S RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS REGARD.HOWEVER,I AM GOING TO WRITE ON BASIC PENSION ISSUE ONLY.

                  revision of pension scheme–bank’s PROPOSAL ON PENSION CONTAINED IN ABOVE NOTED LETTER ADDRESSED TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.

 A) the fixation of two monetary ceiling on maximum be done away with one ceiling on maximum  ON MAXIMUM PENSION FIXED AT 50% OF THE AVERAGE SUBSTANTIVE PAY DRAWN DURING LAST 12 MONTHS PENSIONABLE SERVICE.INOTHER WORDS THERE  WOULD BE ONE CEILING AS DECIDED BY HON’BLE SUPREME COURT IN W.P(C)305/1987(VERDICT DATED 23.02.1989.)

 B) THE REVISED BASIC PAY AND ALLOWANCES PAYABLE INTERMS OF WAGE/SCALES REVISION EFFECTIVE FROM 1.11.1997/1.04.1998 AND NOT STATED IN CLAUSE 16 OF 7TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT.SALARY REVISION OF 7TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT BE CONSIDERED FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPUTATION OF PENSION.THIS LETTER HAS BEEN MENTIONED IN THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2016 BY DELHI HIGHCOURT IN W.P(C)1875/2013 AND INSTRUCTED THAT THIS LETTER SHOULD BE PLACED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTRED BY M.O.F AND COMMITTEE HAS TO GIVE DELIBERATIONS ON THESE RECOMMENDAIONS.THIS LETTER DEALS WITH OF 5TH ,6TH AND 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES AND TO SOME EXTENT TO 8TH BIPARTITE RETIREES.

  THUS COMMITTEE’S REPORT IS AN ESCAPE ROUTE(A PLANNED  MOVE NOT TO PROVIDE PENSION TO S.B.I PENSIONERS AT 50% OF THE LAST 12 MONTHS AVERAGE PAY OF PENSIONABLE SERVICE.WHEN GO THROUGH THE PARAGRAPH 1.17 OF COMMITTEE’S REPORT SAYS”IN WRIT PETITION NO 1875 OF 2013,DELHI HIGH COURT VIDE ORDER DATED 26.04.2016 HAS DESIRED THAT A COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30.10.2002 BE PLACED BEFORE THE COMMITTE FOR CONSIDERATION.THE SAID LETTER WAS PLACED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE TOOK THE NOTE OF THE CONTENTS OF SAID LETTER.

PARAGRPH 1.18. D.F.S INFORMED THAT THE SAID LETTER ALONGWITH ANOTHER LETTER OF S.B.I DATED 12.01.2006 HAS BEEN DULYEXAMINED AND REPLY WAS SENT ON17.02.2006.

  THIS IS A LAME EXCUSE HOW THE REPLY OF THE LETTER DATED 30.10.2002 HAD BEEN SUBMITTED IN 2006 IT SHOWS A PLOY ON THE PART OF M.O.F.

 I.B.A ALSO SHOWS DOUBLE STANDARD IN THE COMMITTEES REPORT HOW CLAUSE 16 HAS BEEN APPLIED IN STATE BANK OF INDIA AS OUR PENSION IS REGULATED BY STATE BANK OF INDIA EMPLOYEES’ PENSION FUND RULES 1955 NOW STATE BANK OF INDIA EMPLOYEES PENSION FUNDREGULATIONS 2014.IN1989 WHEN SUPREME COURT DECIDED IN THEIR VERDICT DATED 23.02.1989 AT THAT TIME STATE BANK OF INDIA PROVIDED THREE BENEFITS .AT PRESENT 80% OF THE PENSIONERS ARE GETTING PENSION AT 50% THEN WHY20%BSTAFF GFETING AT40% THERE IS DISCREMINATION BETWEEN THE SAME CLASS AND THERE IS VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

K.R.SAINI


 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s